Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about incredible advancements, but it also casts a long shadow over the cybersecurity landscape. Threat actors are now leveraging AI to automate and enhance their offensive capabilities, creating a state of “AI-induced insomnia” for CISOs facing an ever-evolving and increasingly sophisticated threat landscape.
Recent industry research highlights a critical problem: organizations are overwhelmed by the sheer volume of security exposures. Studies indicate that organizations typically have about 15,000 exposures that attackers could exploit, with some having over 100,000. This raises an important distinction between exposure management and vulnerability management.
Exposure management goes beyond CVEs to analyze all potential attack paths across hybrid environments – on-premises, cloud, and Active Directory. It shows how attackers can combine vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and identity exposures to reach critical assets. While interconnected vulnerabilities were once difficult to find, AI is making it easier for threat actors to identify these convergent paths, known as “choke points.”
Environments change constantly, making finding and addressing all exposures impossible, and identifying the most important ones – those interconnected exposures – is complex. Even with dedicated efforts, security teams struggle to maintain confidence that they’ve identified all critical pathways. Now, imagine AI amplifying the speed and efficiency with which threat actors can find and exploit those interconnected vulnerabilities. This is the new reality we face.
Modern security approaches focus on attack path modeling and simulated penetration testing using digital twins of production environments. Instead of just identifying vulnerabilities, these solutions map out how attackers can move through a network, pinpointing the most critical areas or choke points that attackers would target to reach critical assets. Research shows that just 2% of exposures are at these critical choke points. This insight is crucial because exposure management is as much about identity issues as it is about CVEs.
AI-powered attacks can make it easier for adersaries to find and exploit vulnerabilities that were previously difficult to discover. This makes attack path modeling even more crucial. Advanced attack graph analysis can reveal all possible attack paths, allowing security teams to understand potential risks. Many critical assets can be reached in just one to four hops from an initial point of intrusion. For example, an attacker might start with a phishing email (hop 1), exploit a vulnerable web server (hop 2), access unprotected credentials (hop 3), and finally reach the financial database (hop 4).
Key Strategies for Addressing AI-driven Attacks
- Prioritized Remediation: Modern security solutions must prioritize issues based on their potential impact. While AI can help attackers find numerous vulnerabilities, focusing on the pathways that will cause the most harm is essential.
- Holistic View: Security teams need to look beyond individual assets and consider their interconnections, understanding how attackers might move from one to another. With AI attacks able to quickly move across networks, understanding the full attack path is crucial.
- Continuous Monitoring: Security posture is dynamic. Research indicates that organizations with poor security postures can have six times the number of security exposures. Continuous simulated penetration testing allows security teams to stay ahead of the evolving threat landscape.
- Contextualized Insights: Comprehensive security solutions must provide context-based insights across all exposures, from cloud to core infrastructure, and pinpoint key intersections where attack paths converge. This is crucial when faced with sophisticated AI-driven attacks that can use various techniques from different parts of your infrastructure.
Industry data emphasizes that simply focusing on vulnerabilities like CVEs is not enough. They account for less than 1% of exposures and only 11% of critical asset exposures. By contrast, identity and credential issues, especially in Active Directory, represent a huge attack surface, and cloud environments now encompass over half of all critical asset exposures. Modern security approaches must analyze these complex attack surfaces to help organizations understand where their critical assets are most at risk.
While the rise of AI-powered hacking presents a significant challenge, it’s not insurmountable. By implementing comprehensive attack path modeling and continuous exposure management, organizations can better protect their critical assets and infrastructure. The key lies in understanding not just individual vulnerabilities, but how they interconnect and what paths they might provide to determined attackers.